Use the recommended way of cloning the industrial_ci repo - and explicit branch name

https://github.com/ros-industrial/industrial_ci/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml#L18

I've been out of touch with industrial_ci for a while, so I need to double check this, but I think that the master branch is expected to be moved to the new version in the relative short term.

We may want to point to legacy for a while, until we're sure we're ready to migrate.

I thought that !24 (merged) was already setting us ready to use the new version.

Just checking now: I see now that there are some things still missing to be migrated.

Going back to this issue: I suggest that we explicitly point to the legacy branch, to avoid having everything fail when the industrial_ci repo owners decide switching branches.

I think that's probably the best, yes. Then we can switch to master explicitly whenever we want to.

That being said, I've been using master on some projects and should be relatively straightforward to migrate for most of our repos. There will probably be some issues related to circular dependencies that we had between some repositories, but I guess it's good to identify and fix those at some point.

I suggest we use legacy and start doing some tests with master in a separate branch.

Btw, the issue is assigned to you, so feel free to make it WIP :-)

added 1 commit

• 8baccd31 - Explicitly point to legacy branch of industrial_ci

Compare with previous version

merged

mentioned in commit 42b977ed